Legal Opinion
County of Riverside v. McLaughlin
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided May 20, 1991No. 89-1817PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court 1
500 U.S. 44 (1991)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ET AL.
v.
McLAUGHLIN ET AL.
No. 89-1817.
Supreme Court of United States.
Argued January 7, 1991.
Decided May 13, 1991.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Timothy T. Coates argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the briefs were Peter J. Ferguson, Michael A. Bell, and Martin Stein.
Dan Stormer argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief were Richard P. Herman, Ben Margolis, and Elizabeth Spector.[*]
2Opinion of the Court · O'ConnorJustice O'Connor
In Gerstein v. Pugh, 420 U. S. 103 (1975), this Court held that the Fourth Amendment requires a prompt judicial…
Also in this document: Dissent · Marshall; Dissent · Scalia.
3Cases cited45 opinions
- City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Gerstein v. PughSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by3 opinions
- Zadvydas v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- McDaniel v. DiazDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
- United States v. Rene Sanchez-GomezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017