Legal Opinion

Henschke v. Young

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 11, 1947No. 34,508PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Matson, Justice.

Defendants appeal from an order denying their motion for a new trial after findings and conclusions and an order for a decree for specific performance of a contract to convey land.

Defendants, as owners of a house and lot in Minneapolis, authorized the Rerat Realty Company to advertise the property and find a purchaser. On January 10,1946, Don Rerat, a member of the realty firm, induced plaintiff to sign an earnest money contract and to make a down payment of $1,000 in the form of a certified check. This contract was then signed and approved by defendants. The purchase price…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Willard v. TayloeSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
  2. Raymond v. McKenzieSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
  3. Stitt v. Rat Portage Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
  4. Selover v. Isle Harbor Land Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1904
  5. Deakin v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Henschke v. ChristianSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
  2. Marriage of Wibbens v. WibbensCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  3. Gunsch v. GunschNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Hudesman v. FoleyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1971
  5. Henschke v. YoungSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API