Legal Opinion
Henschke v. Young
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided May 28, 1948No. 34,612PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Magney, Justice.
Action in unlawful detainer. From the judgment for restitution, defendant Harry A. Gray appeals.
On January 10,1946, plaintiff entered into an earnest money contract with defendants A. C. Young and Eleanor H. Young, his wife, for the purchase of the premises here involved. Thereafter, defendants Young having refused to convey, an action for specific performance of the contract was brought by plaintiff against the Youngs. The order of the district court granting specific performance was affirmed by this court in Henschke v. Young, 224 Minn. 339, 28 N. W. (2d) 766. Plaintiff’s…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- William Weisman Holding Co. v. MillerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
- William Weisman Realty Co. v. CohenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
- Keller v. HenvitSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
- Henschke v. YoungSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
- Nellas v. CarlineSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
3Cited by4 opinions
- Dahlberg v. YoungSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
- Henschke v. ChristianSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
- Northwest Holding Co. v. EvansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
- Pushor v. DaleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954