Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Gunsch v. Gunsch

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 1955No. 7439PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORRIS, Judge.

This appeal involves two causes of action, the first of which is for the foreclosure of a chattel mortgage given by Tony Gunsch to the plaintiff, David Gunsch, covering certain personal property consisting of farm machinery and twenty-six head of cattle to secure the sum of $4,000. The second cause of action seeks foreclosure of a land contract for the sale of a section of land in Mercer County from David Gunsch to Tony Gunsch.

Tony Gunsch, by separate answer, alleges that he has substantially cpmplied with all of the terms of the contract for sale of the land involved. By way of…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Eppstein v. KuhnIllinois Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Thaw v. Town of FairfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1945
  3. Cowart v. SingletarySupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
  4. Brady v. WelshSupreme Court of Iowa · 1925
  5. Merritz v. CircelliSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Gard v. RazanskasSupreme Court of Iowa · 1957
  2. Green v. GustafsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Riffey v. SchulkeNebraska Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Angus Hunt Ranch, Inc. v. BowenWyoming Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Gilles v. SproutSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API