Legal Opinion

NEVEDA INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION v. Dixon

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided June 12, 1961No. 4365PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

McNamee, J.:

Respondent was injured in an automobile accident while traveling from his home in Las Vegas to Camp Mercury where he was employed as a pipefitter by Reynolds Electrical & Engineering Company, hereinafter called Reynolds. The distance between Las Vegas and Camp Mercury is 60 miles. At the time of the accident respondent was riding in an automobile owned and operated by a friend who had no connection or relationship with Reynolds. Both respondent and Reynolds had accepted the provisions of the Nevada Industrial Insurance Act and coverage under said Act was in…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Cardillo v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Voehl v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  3. Freire v. Matson Navigation Co.California Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Puett v. Bahnson Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  5. Provenzano v. LongNevada Supreme Court · 1947

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Northern Nevada Mobile Home Brokers v. PenrodNevada Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Crank v. Nevada Industrial CommissionNevada Supreme Court · 1984
  3. MGM MIRAGE v. CottonNevada Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Candelaria Industries, Inc. v. Occidental Petroleum Corp.District Court, D. Nevada · 1987
  5. Jourdan v. State Industrial Insurance SystemNevada Supreme Court · 1993

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API