Legal Opinion

Mahoney v. Sharff

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 14, 1961No. Civ. 19340PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBray, P. J.

Appeals by both parties to the judgment.

Questions Presented

Primarily, the question involved is the interpretation of an attorney’s retainer contract.

Defendant’s Appeal

1. Is plaintiff entitled to credit the attorney’s fees awarded defendant in the divorce action on the amount of the attorney’s fees provided in the contingent contract?

2. Is the judgment in excess of the trial court’s jurisdiction ?

3. Was interest properly awarded plaintiff?

Plaintiff’s Appeal

Was the order in the divorce case requiring plaintiff’s former husband to pay the community debts a “recovery” under the contingent fee…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Hansen v. CovellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Bennett v. PotterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Meisner v. McIntoshCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Weil v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  5. Krieger v. BulpittCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Gonzales v. GonzalesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  2. Untiedt v. Grand Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
  3. Knight v. AquiDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2013
  4. Coons v. KaryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  5. Fulop v. GrissomCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API