Legal Opinion
Fulop v. Grissom
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 11, 1979No. Civ. No. 56037PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
*609Opinion
ASHBY, J.
Appellants Irwin Fulop and Esther Handmaker appeal from that portion of an order settling the first account current of the trustee of the estate of Clarence F. Ott, deceased, which denies appellants’ petition for compensation of attorneys.
Appellant Fulop is an attorney licensed to practice law in California. Appellant Esther Handmaker is the widow of Herman Handmaker, who was an attorney licensed to practice law in Kentucky. It is agreed she has succeeded to his interest in the attorney compensation agreement disputed in this case. Respondents Charles Manteuffel and David…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Sprague v. Ticonic National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Trustees v. GreenoughSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Serrano v. PriestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- Central Railroad & Banking Co. of Ga. v. PettusSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Glendale City Employees' Ass'n v. City of GlendaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Estate of OttCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979