Legal Opinion

In Re Settlement of Baalson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 10, 1941No. 33,099PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

1 Reported in 300 N.W. 204. Appeal from a judgment determining the settlement of a wife and minor child for poor relief purposes.

The controlling facts were stipulated. The conclusions of law are attacked by the assignments of error. The facts are these: The respondent city as well as the appellant village are under the town system as to poor relief. Prior to 1928, Mrs. Myrtle Luella Baalson lived with her husband, Elvin Baalson, at Duluth, Minnesota. During that year she without cause willfully deserted him and never returned. She has not been divorced from him. Since 1932 her husband has…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Prater v. PraterTennessee Supreme Court · 1888
  2. City of Willmar v. Village of SpicerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
  3. Town of Mount Holly v. Town of PeruSupreme Court of Vermont · 1899
  4. Inhabitants of Greece v. Inhabitants of WindhamSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1836
  5. In Re Settlement of GoldenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In Re Settlement of StewartSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  2. County of Becker v. County of HennepinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
  3. City of Minneapolis v. County of St. LouisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  4. City of Minneapolis v. Township of IndependenceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  5. In Re Determining Settlement for Poor-Relief Purposes of SonnenbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API