Legal Opinion
In Re Settlement of Golden
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided January 2, 1931No. 28,204PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.
The village of Bowlus appeals from a decree adjudging it to be the settlement of Mrs. Roy (Caroline) Golden and minor children, paupers, rendered in a proceeding instituted by the county of Aitkin under 1 Mason, 1927, §§ 3161-1 to 3161-5.
The facts disclosed by the record are: In May, 1919, Roy Golden moved to the village of Bowlus, Morrison county, this state, with his family consisting of wife and two children. His work was that of a section foreman for a railway company. He and his family lived there continuously from then on until in December, 1928, when the wife and children were…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Town of Cabot v. Town of St. JohnsburySupreme Court of Vermont · 1920
- City of Willmar v. Village of SpicerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
- Kay v. WatsonOhio Supreme Court · 1848
- City of Syracuse v. County of Onondaga, New York County Courts1898
- Burlington v. SwanvilleSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1874
3Cited by4 opinions
- In Re Settlement of BaalsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
- City of Minneapolis v. Village of NerstrandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
- City of Minneapolis v. Township of WhitefieldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
- In Re Settlement of RutlandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943