Legal Opinion
In Re Determining Settlement for Poor-Relief Purposes of Sonnenberg
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided November 20, 1959No. 37,804PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
256 Minn. 571 (1959)
99 N.W. (2d) 444
IN RE DETERMINING SETTLEMENT FOR POOR-RELIEF PURPOSES OF DANIEL KEITH SONNENBERG.
COUNTY OF BECKER
v.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN AND OTHERS.
No. 37,804.
Supreme Court of Minnesota.
November 20, 1959.
Sigwel Wood, for appellant.
M.J. Daly, for respondent Hobart Township.
Owen V. Thompson, for respondent Otter Tail County.
George M. Scott, County Attorney, and John K. Harvey, Assistant County Attorney, for respondent Hennepin County.
MATSON, JUSTICE.
Appeal from a judgment determining that a minor child, born in Otter Tail County, has settlement for poor-relief purposes in…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Corbridge v. CorbridgeIndiana Supreme Court · 1952
- Iroquois Iron Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1920
- Porter v. PowellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1890
- Swift & Co. v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1905
- Lufkin v. HarveySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In Re Application of County of Beltrami to Determine Settlement of JoyceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
- State, ex rel. R.R. v. C.R.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1990