Legal Opinion

Prater v. Prater

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1888PublishedCited by 32 opinions

EROM KNOX. Appeal in error from Circuit Court of Knox County. 8. T. Logan, J.

1Opinion of the CourtCaldwell, J.

This is a bill for dower and homestead.

The Chancellor refused the claim of dower, but allowed that of homestead.

*79Complainant acquiesced, in the decree; but the defendant has, by writ of error, brought to this Court for revision so much of it as adjudged complainant entitled to homestead.

It is alleged in the bill and admitted in the answer that complainant Margaret Prater and Am-brose Prater intermarried “ many years ago ” in this State, and lived here together, as man and wife for “ several years; ” that, thereafter, they were separated, for a long period of time, and never lived together…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lacey v. ClementsTexas Supreme Court · 1872
  2. Johnson v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1801

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Mohler v. Estate of ShankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1895
  2. Arthur v. IsraelSupreme Court of Colorado · 1890
  3. Grier v. CanadaTennessee Supreme Court · 1907
  4. In Re SivleyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1981
  5. Pendleton v. BrownArizona Supreme Court · 1923

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API