Legal Opinion

Leaksville Light & Power Co. v. Georgia Casualty Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 19, 1924PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hoke, O. J.,

after making the above statement: The policy sued on as stated, contains an agreement to indemnify plaintiff against claims on account of bodily injuries, etc., suffered by any one not an employee of the company by reason of the operation of the work of the assured, with stipulations among others as follows:

“Subject to the following conditions which are to be construed as conditions precedent:

“Condition A: This policy does not cover loss arising from injuries or death (1) caused by persons whose compensation is not included in the estimated compensation set forth in the said…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Duran v. Standard Life & Accident Ins.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1891
  2. East Carolina Railway Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1907

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Loveman, Joseph Loeb v. New Amsterdam CasualtySupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  2. McCain v. Hartford Live Stock InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  3. Lammers v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1972
  4. Heinrich v. Globe Indemnity CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 1964
  5. Richardson v. . SatterwhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API