Life Casualty Ins. Co. of Tennessee v. Tollison
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtBouldin, J.
The suit is on an accident insurance policy to recover the stipulated benefit for loss of one hand and one foot.
The contract is a limited one known as a “Travel and Pedestrian Policy.” Its pertinent provisions appear in the report of the case.
The claim here involved is under the clause extending protection to “truck drivers * * * when engaged in the line of their employment, in actually driving or operating a public conveyance.”
The evidence for plaintiff, the insured, tended to show that, while driving a motortruck, a public conveyance, in the line of his employment, on a public highway in…
2Cited by11 opinions
- Loveman, Joseph Loeb v. New Amsterdam CasualtySupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
- Lammers v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1972
- Life Casualty Ins. Co. v. WhitehurstSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
- Alabama Farm Bureau Mutual Casualty Insurance v. Government Employees InsuranceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1970
- Holloway v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1963
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.