Legal Opinion

New York Life Ins. Co. v. Torrance

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 31, 1932No. 6 Div. 977PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.

The suit was to recover under the “permanent total disability” clause of three separate life insurance policies issued by defendant, two of which are identical, and the third differing only in minor respects, not essential here to note. In each it is provided that in order for the disability benefit to attach, the insured must become disabled before the anniversary of the policy on which the-insured’s age at nearest birthday is sixty years. Plaintiff became sixty years of age on September 30,1928. The anniversary of the first two policies (in point of time of issuance) nearest to plaintiff’s…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Cato v. Ætna Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1927
  2. Lobdill v. Laboring Men's Mutual Aid Ass'n of ChatfieldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
  3. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. BlueSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
  4. Hohn v. Inter-State Casualty Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Travelers' Ins. Co. v. PlasterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Margie C. Barnes v. Atlantic & Pacific Life Insurance Company of America, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
  2. Colonial Life and Accident Insurance Co. v. CollinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1967
  3. McGifford v. Protective Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  4. Equitable Life Assur. Soc. v. DorrietySupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
  5. Life Insurance Company of Georgia v. MillerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1974

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API