Legal Opinion

Consolidated Fisheries Co. v. Consolidated Solubles Co.

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided February 28, 1955PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wolcott, Justice:

This appeal brings before us for review a judgment ordering a final accounting and, in part, settling details of the accounting. Portions of the judgment are assigned as errors all of which are set out hereafter.

The facts giving rise to the litigation are summarized.

In early 1951, Thomas H. Hayes (hereafter called Hayes) suggested to David Levin (hereafter called Levin) that he, Levin, erect a plant for the evaporation of weak fish stickwater, which is a waste product of the operation conducted by Consolidated Fisheries Company (hereafter called Fisheries) for the processing…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Tri-Continental Corporation v. BattyeSupreme Court of Delaware · 1950
  2. Peyton v. William C. Peyton Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1939
  3. New York Trust Co. v. RileySupreme Court of Delaware · 1940
  4. Nye Odorless Incinerator Corp. v. FeltonSuperior Court of Delaware · 1931
  5. Eastern States Petroleum Co. v. Universal Oil Products Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1939

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Hill v. Cross Country Settlement, LLCCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  2. Great Lakes Chemical Corp. v. Pharmacia Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2001
  3. Collins v. BurkeSupreme Court of Delaware · 1980
  4. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. AIG Life InsuranceCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2005
  5. Toner v. Allstate InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1993

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API