Legal Opinion

Nye Odorless Incinerator Corp. v. Felton

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided January 28, 1931No. 64PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rodney, J.:

The admission of the offered exhibit dated July 14, 1928, has been opposed because the agreement of December 15, 1928, between Shemwell and Felton (adopted and affirmed by the subsequent agreement of December 24, 1928) is assumed to include and supersede all prior understandings and agreements.

*242It is argued by the plaintiff that false representations and fraud in the negotiations led to the execution of the contract, and that in such a suit as the present, these alleged fraudulent representations can be shown where the contract is based upon the representations themselves.

The…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Old Dominion Copper Mining & Smelting Co. v. LewisohnSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Scholfield Gear & Pulley Co. v. ScholfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1898
  3. Davis v. Las Ovas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
  4. Yeiser v. United States Board & Paper Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1901
  5. Gary v. MayOhio Supreme Court · 1847

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Stephenson v. Capano Development, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1983
  2. Riley v. New York Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. Browne v. RobbSupreme Court of Delaware · 1990
  4. E.I. duPont De Nemours & Co. v. Florida Evergreen FoliageSupreme Court of Delaware · 1999
  5. Lock v. SchrepplerSuperior Court of Delaware · 1981

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API