Legal Opinion
Hill v. Peterson
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided November 27, 2001No. 2 CA-CV 98-0153PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ESPINOSA, Chief Judge.
¶ 1 Defendants/appellees Timothy and Susan Peterson asked us to reconsider our May 22, 2001, opinion vacating the trial court’s order dismissing plaintiff/appellant Donald Hill’s tortious interference with prospective advantage causes of action against them. Hill v. Peterson, 200 Ariz. 217, 25 P.3d 19 (App.2001). The Petersons contend we incorrectly found Hill’s causes of action not preempted by the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 141 through 187 (the Act), arguing that the jurisdiction of the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) depends not on the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Linn v. United Plant Guard Workers of America, Local 114Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Farmer v. United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners of America, Local 25Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. San Diego County District Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Wagenseller v. Scottsdale Memorial HospitalArizona Supreme Court · 1985
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Hutto v. FranciscoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
- White Mountain Health Center, Inc. v. Maricopa CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
- Smith v. Cigna HealthPlanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
- American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees v. City of PhoenixCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
- MacKey, Schuessler, Bayly v. Mayor and Council of the City of TucsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.