Legal Opinion

Hutto v. Francisco

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided March 3, 2005No. 1 CA-CV 03-0678PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LANKFORD, Presiding Judge.

¶ 1 This appeal requires us to decide whether a vehicle owner may bear tort liability for a death arising from the absence of a safety belt. Specifically, may a jury find that the owner must maintain the safety belt as part of his duty to keep his vehicle in safe operating condition? Is state tort law liability permitted despite the existence of federal safety regulation of vehicle manufacturers?

¶2 We answer both of these questions affirmatively. Accordingly, we reverse the superior court’s summary judgment for Defendant vehicle owners.

¶3 Sadly, this case…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Geier v. American Honda Motor Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Orme School v. ReevesArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Ontiveros v. BorakArizona Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Markowitz v. Arizona Parks BoardArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Rossell v. Volkswagen of AmericaArizona Supreme Court · 1985

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Conklin Et Ux v. Medtronic IncArizona Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Reyes v. Frank's Service & Trucking, LLCCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
  3. Rogers v. Board of Regents of the University of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
  4. Kobold v. Aetna Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
  5. Ibarra v. GastelumCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2020

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API