Legal Opinion

MacKey, Schuessler, Bayly v. Mayor and Council of the City of Tucson

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided August 25, 2004No. 2 CA-CV 2004-0050PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HOWARD, Presiding Judge.

¶ 1 Appellants Paul and Maureen Mackey, Betty Gail Schuessler, and Bruce Bayly (collectively, the Mackeys) appeal from the trial court’s judgment denying special action relief on their complaint, in which they had sought to void appellee City of Tucson’s transfer of title to a portion of a street and to enforce certain notice requirements for the sale of public roadways. Finding that the City exchanged the roadway and, therefore, was not required to comply with the procedural requirements for a sale, we affirm.

¶2 The relevant facts are undisputed. The City of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hayes v. Continental InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Big D Construction Corp. v. Court of AppealsArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Fain Land & Cattle Co. v. HassellArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  4. ASH, Inc. v. Mesa Unified School District No. 4Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
  5. Martineau v. Maricopa CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Wenc v. Sierra Vista Unified School District No. 68Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
  2. Wenc v. SIERRA VISTA UNIFIED SCHOOL DIST.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API