Legal Opinion

Rupp v. Kahn

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 7, 1966No. Civ. 28818PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKingsley, J.

Plaintiff sued defendant Maudeen Clifton Kahn, both individually as the surviving joint tenant of Sam Kahn and as executrix of his last will and testament. Two causes of action Avere alleged. The first was on a rejected creditor’s claim. It alleges that plaintiff is the holder of a promissory note, executed by decedent, in the face amount of $1,000, on Avhich it is alleged that there was due, as of December 5, 1961, $903.58 plus accrued interest and attorney fees. It is also alleged that a verified claim for the amount due was filed “on March 6, 1963,” and that, “on September 18, 1963”…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Weinstock v. EisslerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  2. Schlyen v. SchlyenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Kalt v. YoungworthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Brodzinsky v. PulekNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962
  5. Kritzer v. LancasterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Cortez v. VogtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
  2. Schoenfeld v. NorbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  3. Johansen v. PeltonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  4. Dieden v. SchmidtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  5. Grothe v. Cortlandt Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1992

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API