Legal Opinion

Tenneco, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided July 7, 1989No. 735-81TPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RADER, Judge.

In this tax refund suit, plaintiff, Tenneco, Inc., seeks recovery of $2,022,340.00 paid in federal manufacturer’s excise taxes. From 1972 through the third quarter of 1975, Tenneco’s subsidiary, Walker Manufacturing, mistakenly paid excise taxes on motor vehicle parts and accessories that were in fact exempt from taxation. Tenneco incorrectly classified dual use and recreational vehicle parts as taxable truck parts, rather than exempt automobile parts.

Although defendant concedes that plaintiff mistakenly paid the tax, a refund is not automatic. The Internal Revenue Code…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Helvering v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Commissioner v. DanielsonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1967
  3. United States v. Jefferson Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
  4. Andrew Jergens Co. v. ConnerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1942
  5. Worthington Pump & Machinery Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1954

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Ranger Fuel Corp. v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1998
  2. Emerald International Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
  3. Holmes Limestone Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1996
  4. Locus Telecommunications, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
  5. Omni Moving & Storage of Virginia, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API