Legal Opinion

Andrew Jergens Co. v. Conner

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided February 11, 1942No. 8811PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAMILTON, Circuit Judge.

Appellants appeal from a judgment dismissing their petition to recover excise taxes on toilet preparations and cosmetics imposed on them by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue, for the period from September 4, 1935, through February 1937, pursuant to Section 603 of the Revenue Act of 1932, 47 Stat. 169, 26 U.S.C.A. Int. Rev.Acts, page 608; 26 U.S.C.A. Internal Revenue Code, § 3443(d).

The above section of the act imposed a tax on the manufacturers of toilet preparations enumerated therein, equivalent to ten percent of the sales price of certain articles and five…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Reiss v. ReardonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927
  2. Continental Baking Co. v. Suckow Milling Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1939
  3. Brenner v. GaunceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1928
  4. Golding Bros. v. DumaineCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1937

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Grover Hill Grain Co. v. Baughman-Oster, Inc., Defendant-Third Party Champion Screw Company, Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
  2. United States v. Gerald JettCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1974
  3. Samuel H. Sheppard v. E. L. Maxwell, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1965
  4. Ranger Fuel Corp. v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1998
  5. Worthington Pump & Machinery Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1954

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API