Legal Opinion

Keesling v. Baker & Daniels

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided May 21, 1991No. 73A01-9012-CV-486PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BAKER, Judge.

Plaintiff-appellants Leroy Keesling, Vivian Keesling and Leroy Keesling Farms (collectively, the Keeslings) appeal the trial court's entry of summary judgment in favor of defendant-appellees Baker & Daniels, Daniel Johnson and James Carr (collectively, Baker & Daniels) in this action for attorney malpractice. We affirm.

ISSUES

The Keeslings raise the following issues for our review:

I. Whether the trial court erred in finding their action was barred by the applicable statute of limitations.

II. Whether the trial court abused its discretion in granting Baker & Daniels' motions for…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Gaboury v. Ireland Road Grace Brethren, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Willsey v. Peoples Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of East ChicagoIndiana Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. Ludwig v. Ford Motor Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. Archem, Inc. v. SimoIndiana Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. Cacdac v. HilandIndiana Supreme Court · 1990

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Boggs v. Tri-State Radiology, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Lucas v. Dorsey Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. Miller v. Monsanto Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. Hughes v. GlaeseIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Hopster v. BurgesonIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API