Keesling v. Baker & Daniels
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
BAKER, Judge.
Plaintiff-appellants Leroy Keesling, Vivian Keesling and Leroy Keesling Farms (collectively, the Keeslings) appeal the trial court's entry of summary judgment in favor of defendant-appellees Baker & Daniels, Daniel Johnson and James Carr (collectively, Baker & Daniels) in this action for attorney malpractice. We affirm.
ISSUES
The Keeslings raise the following issues for our review:
I. Whether the trial court erred in finding their action was barred by the applicable statute of limitations.
II. Whether the trial court abused its discretion in granting Baker & Daniels' motions for…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Gaboury v. Ireland Road Grace Brethren, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1983
- Willsey v. Peoples Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of East ChicagoIndiana Court of Appeals · 1988
- Ludwig v. Ford Motor Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1987
- Archem, Inc. v. SimoIndiana Court of Appeals · 1990
- Cacdac v. HilandIndiana Supreme Court · 1990
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Boggs v. Tri-State Radiology, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 2000
- Lucas v. Dorsey Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1993
- Miller v. Monsanto Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1993
- Hughes v. GlaeseIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
- Hopster v. BurgesonIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.