Legal Opinion

Litho Color, Inc. v. Pacific Employers Insurance

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided September 20, 1999No. 41294-9-IPublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAppelwick, J.

Litho Color sought coverage under a “Boiler and Machinery” (B&M) endorsement to its commercial property insurance policy for claims arising in October 1991 and February 1992. Pacific Employers Insurance Company (PEIC) issued the B&M policy; however, it was fully reinsured by Hartford Steam Boiler Inspection and Insurance Company (HSB). Prior to trial, Litho and PEIC reached a settlement that released PEIC from certain claims and liabilities in exchange for $335,000, but technically kept PEIC in the suit.

On appeal, Litho, HSB and PEIC each assign errors to the trial court’s rulings with…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Thorndike v. Hesperian Orchards, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Olympic Steamship Co., Inc. v. Centennial Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Prier v. Refrigeration Engineering Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Hizey v. CarpenterWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Bering v. ShareWashington Supreme Court · 1986

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Panag v. Farmers Ins. Co. of WashingtonWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Guijosa v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Guijosa v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Holiday Resort Community Ass'n v. Echo Lake Associates, L.L.C.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2006
  5. Joy v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API