Joy v. Department of Labor & Industries
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtVan Deren, J.
¶1 Cheryl Joy appeals the trial court’s order granting judgment as a matter of law1 to the Washington State Department of Labor and Industries (L&I). She argues that the trial court erred in concluding that RCW 70.14.120(3)2 precludes a court’s determination that spinal cord stimulation was a medically necessary and proper treatment in her case.3 We hold that the trial court did not err in granting L&I judgment as a matter of law because RCW 70.14.120(3) precludes both court orders requiring L&I to provide spinal stimulation benefits and hearings to determine whether spinal cord stimulation…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Department of Ecology v. Campbell & Gwinn, L.L.C.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
- State, Dept. of Ecology v. Campbell & GwinnWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- Cowiche Canyon Conservancy v. BosleyWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. J.P.Washington Supreme Court · 2003
- King County v. Central Puget SoundWashington Supreme Court · 2000
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- DC Farms, LLC v. Conagra Foods Lamb Weston, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2014
- Brownfield v. City of YakimaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
- Clipse v. Commercial Driver Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2015
- Diane Christian, et ux v. Antoine Tohmeh, MD, et uxCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
- Butson v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.