Legal Opinion

Joy v. Department of Labor & Industries

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided September 11, 2012No. 42118-6-IIPublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVan Deren, J.

¶1 Cheryl Joy appeals the trial court’s order granting judgment as a matter of law1 to the Washington State Department of Labor and Industries (L&I). She argues that the trial court erred in concluding that RCW 70.14.120(3)2 precludes a court’s determination that spinal cord stimulation was a medically necessary and proper treatment in her case.3 We hold that the trial court did not err in granting L&I judgment as a matter of law because RCW 70.14.120(3) precludes both court orders requiring L&I to provide spinal stimulation benefits and hearings to determine whether spinal cord stimulation…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Department of Ecology v. Campbell & Gwinn, L.L.C.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State, Dept. of Ecology v. Campbell & GwinnWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Cowiche Canyon Conservancy v. BosleyWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  4. State v. J.P.Washington Supreme Court · 2003
  5. King County v. Central Puget SoundWashington Supreme Court · 2000

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. DC Farms, LLC v. Conagra Foods Lamb Weston, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  2. Brownfield v. City of YakimaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
  3. Clipse v. Commercial Driver Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  4. Diane Christian, et ux v. Antoine Tohmeh, MD, et uxCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  5. Butson v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API