Legal Opinion

Dohs v. Kerfoot

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 15, 1931No. 28,470PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.

Plaintiff appeals from the order denying her motion for judgment notwithstanding or a new trial.

Defendant is a stock broker, and through her agent plaintiff subscribed for 100 shares of stock of a corporation called the Insurance Holding Company, for which she agreed to pay $1,500, of which she paid $1,000 January 11, 1928, and the balance on July 2, 1928. About two years later she returned the stock to defendant’s office and demanded payment of the $1,500 paid therefor with interest from the dates of payment, on the claim that the stock ivas misrepresented. Defendant communicated with the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Pierce v. StaubSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1906
  2. Scheer v. F. P. Harbaugh Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  3. Lambert v. ElmendorfAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
  4. Laubach v. LaubachSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1873
  5. Lare v. Westmoreland Specialty Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Barker v. NessNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  2. E. Edelman & Co. v. Queen Stove Works, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
  3. Brink v. LarsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  4. Nauman v. J's Restaurants International, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API