Lare v. Westmoreland Specialty Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 156, Oct., T., 1892, by-defendants, Westmoreland Specialty Company, George R. West and Charles H. West, from judgment of C. P. No. 3, Allegheny Co., Aug. T., 1891, No. 32, on verdict for plaintiff, Marcellus R. Lare. Trespass for deceit in sale of corporation stock.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 156, Oct., T., 1892, by-defendants, Westmoreland Specialty Company, George R. West and Charles H. West, from judgment of C. P. No. 3, Allegheny Co., Aug. T., 1891, No. 32, on verdict for plaintiff, Marcellus R. Lare. Trespass for deceit in sale of corporation stock. At the trial, before McClung, J., plaintiff claimed to recover $7,500, which he had paid as a subscription to the capital stock of the Westmoreland Specialty Co. on certain representations made to him by the defendants, George R. West and Charles H. West, two of the officers of the company, which representations…
1Opinion of the Court
Pee Curiam,
We find nothing in the assignments of error which requires discussion. The case involves questions of fact which were fairly submitted to the jury.
Judgment affirmed.
2Cited by2 opinions
- Grant v. LovekinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
- Dohs v. KerfootSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931