Legal Opinion

Scheer v. F. P. Harbaugh Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 6, 1925No. 24,688PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

Plaintiff sues upon two causes of action; one for damages for fraud claimed to have been perpetrated by defendant in the sale of a rebuilt tractor and the other for the rescission, upon the ground of defendant’s breach of contract, of the purchase by plaintiff from defendant of a threshing outfit. The jury, passing upon the first cause of action, found for plaintiff and assessed his damages at $SS1. In connection with the second cause of action they answered a special question to the effect that, as claimed by plaintiff, defendant had breached his contract to sell the threshing outfit.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. I. L. Corse & Co. v. Minnesota Grain Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
  2. Kirby v. DeanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  3. Encyclopedia Press, Inc. v. HarrisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Spiess v. BrandtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  2. E. Edelman & Co. v. Queen Stove Works, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
  3. Hatch v. KulickSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
  4. Hedback v. American Family Mutual Insurance (In Re Mathews)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 1997
  5. Houchin v. Braham Investment Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1938

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API