Legal Opinion

United States v. Ernest Joseph Gibas

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided March 5, 1964No. 14348PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CASTLE, Circuit Judge.

The defendant, Ernest Joseph Gibas, prosecutes this appeal from an order of the District Court denying his motion, filed pursuant to Rule 35 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure (18 U.S. C.A.), in which he sought correction of the sentence contained in the written judgment order entered on his conviction on thirty-five counts of a multiple count indictment. 1

The defendant contends the District Court erred in denying his motion to correct the written judgment order to conform to the oral pronouncement of sentence and in this connection claims the oral sentence…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. Ernest Joseph Gibas, Donald Dowd Fulton and Michael Emmett Byrne,defendants-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1962
  2. United States v. Roy Rudolph DrakeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1960
  3. Bernard Edmond Laclair v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1962

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. Frank O. BeckerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
  2. People v. SmithAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
  3. United States v. Louis WolfCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
  4. United States v. Robert Grene and Norman GradskyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
  5. United States v. Howard FryeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API