Legal Opinion

United States v. Roy Rudolph Drake

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided January 28, 1960No. 12726PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HASTINGS, Chief Judge.

Defendant, Roy Rudolph Drake, appeals from an order of the district court dated June 17,1959, denying his “Motion for Correction of Written Judgment and Commitment” filed pursuant to Rule 35 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, 18 U.S.C.A.

On September 27, 1956, defendant entered a plea of guilty to two three-count indictments charging him with two separate crimes of bank robbery under Title 18 U.S.C.A. § 2113. Violations of subsections (a), (d) and (e) of this Act were alleged in each indictment. He was sentenced to 15 years on each of the three counts in each…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Prince v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Wilson v. BellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1943
  3. Claude E. Spriggs v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
  4. Hode v. SanfordCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1939
  5. Watkins v. MerryCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1939

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. William Howard DuncanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1962
  2. Michael E. Thorne v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1969
  3. Bernard Edmond Laclair v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1962
  4. United States v. Ernest Joseph GibasCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1964
  5. Baysden v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1963

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API