Legal Opinion

United States v. Howard Frye

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided March 15, 1966No. 15402_1PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

CASTLE, Circuit Judge.

Howard Frye, defendant-appellant, was convicted under a nine-count indictment charging substantive narcotics violations and conspiracy. The conviction, and the convictions of co-defendants Fred Coduto and Coyit Baker, were affirmed in United States v. Coduto, 7 Cir., 284 F.2d 464.

The trial court pronounced sentence upon the defendants Frye and Baker as follows:

“I hereby sentence Howard Frye and Coyit Baker to twenty yeárs on each of the nine counts of the indictment, to run concurrently. I fine each of them $10,000.00”.

The judgment and commitment, order entered in the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. DaughertySupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. United States v. Fred Coduto, Howard Frye and Coyit BakerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1961
  3. United States v. Roy Rudolph DrakeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1960
  4. Bernard Edmond Laclair v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1962
  5. United States v. Ernest Joseph GibasCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1964

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Coyit Baker v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API