Legal Opinion

Seaboard Surety Co. v. Commonwealth

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 22, 1944No. Appeal, 8PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Patterson,

This is an appeal by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania from the order of the court below vacating an arbitration award in its favor because of misconduct of tbe arbitrators.. Where a Board of Arbitration secures ex parte evidence upon a fundamental issue of fact after the matter has been submitted to it for determination, and no notice thereof or opportunity to attack such evidence has been given to the claimant, are the arbitrators guilty of such misconduct within the meaning of Section 10 of the Act of 1927, P. L. 381, 5 P.S. Section 170, which would warrant…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Stefano Berizzi Co. v. KrauszNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
  2. Curran v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
  3. Seaboard Surety Co. v. Commonw'lth.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  4. E. Gerli & Co. v. Oscar Heineman Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1932
  5. Robins Silk Manufacturing Co. v. Consolidated Piece Dye WorksNew York Court of Appeals · 1929

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Cassara v. WoffordSupreme Court of Florida · 1951
  2. Wark & Co. v. Twelfth & Sansom Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  3. Carolina-Virginia Fashion Exhibitors, Inc. v. GunterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  4. Reisman v. Ranoel Realty Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  5. Wojdak v. Greater Philadelphia Cablevision, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API