Legal Opinion

Robins Silk Manufacturing Co. v. Consolidated Piece Dye Works

New York Court of Appeals

Decided May 28, 1929PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The appellant, Robins Silk Manufacturing Co., Inc., delivered silks to the respondent, Consolidated Piece Dye Works, to be dyed. A controversy as to the manner in which the work had been done was submitted to arbitration. A motion was made by the appellant to vacate the award on two grounds: First, that one of the three arbitrators had been guilty of misbehavior in inspecting the respondent’s machinery in the absence of the parties, and second, that another arbitrator had been guilty of misbehavior in bargaining with the respondent for employment while the arbitration was pending. The Supreme…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Stefano Berizzi Co. v. KrauszNew York Court of Appeals · 1925

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Seaboard Surety Co. v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API