Legal Opinion

Cassara v. Wofford

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided November 20, 1951PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

55 So.2d 102 (1951)

CASSARA

v.

WOFFORD.

Supreme Court of Florida, en Banc.

November 20, 1951.

Watkins & Cohen, Tallahassee, and Jack Kehoe, Miami, for appellant.

Lyle D. Holcomb and Hudson & Cason, all of Miami, for appellee.

ROBERTS, Justice.

This appeal brings for our review a judgment on an arbitration award made and entered in proceedings below pursuant to an agreement of the parties which was made a Rule of Court.

The appellant and the appellee were lessee and lessor, respectively, of certain property under a ten-year lease agreement, and under the terms of which the lessee had deposited $30,000…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. City of Omaha v. Omaha Water Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1910
  2. Sapp v. BarenfeldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Stefano Berizzi Co. v. KrauszNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
  4. Arbitration Puget Sound Bridge & Dredging Co. v. Lake Washington ShipyardsWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Colombia v. Cauca Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1903

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Schnurmacher Holding, Inc. v. NoriegaSupreme Court of Florida · 1989
  2. Middlesex Mutual Insurance Company v. Stuart LevineCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
  3. Nizinski v. Golden Valley Electric Ass'n, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1973
  4. National Tea Co. v. RichmondSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1989
  5. Citizens Property Insurance v. Mango Hill 6 Condominium Ass'nDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API