Legal Opinion
In re the Arbitration between New York Central Railroad & Erie Railroad
New York Supreme Court
Decided January 18, 1961PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMatthew M. Levy, J.
The New York Central Railroad Company seeks an order, pursuant to section 1450 of the Civil Practice Act, to compel the Erie Railroad Company to proceed to arbitration of a certain controversy in accordance with a clause allegedly providing therefor, contained in a trackage agreement made in 1897 between the petitioner’s predecessor company (hereinafter called Central) and the respondent (hereinafter called Erie).
*363Under that contract, Erie was granted certain trackage rights and facilities in the operation of its trains upon Central’s tracks between Corning, New York, and Newberry Junction,…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Marchant v. Mead-Morrison Manufacturing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1929
- Matter of Berkovitz v. . Arbib HoulbergNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
- Matter of Lipman (Haeuser Shellac Co.)New York Court of Appeals · 1942
- Matter of Zimmerman v. . CohenNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
- Lynn v. LynnNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- In re the Arbitration between Paver & Wildfoerster & Catholic High School Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Gold Coast Mall, Inc. v. Larmar Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1983
- In Re the Arbitration of Controversies Between Necchi Sewing MacHine Sales Corp. & CarlDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1966
- Skidmore, Owings Merrill v. Conn. Gen. Life Ins.Connecticut Superior Court · 1963
- Sanabria v. Village of MonticelloDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1976
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.