Sanders v. State
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
SIMPSON, Justice.
Answering your inquiry of January 5, 1954, propounded to this court under authority of § 88, Title 13, Code 1940, our view is that the quoted argument of the solicitor who prosecuted for the State did not go beyond the limits of legitimate forensic discussion. While the bare quotations may not give us a true picture of the exact status of the argument, it would seem to us that the statements of the solicitor were merely arguendo of his opinion of the case and what the result of the jury’s verdict should be. This case should be ruled by such cases as Davidson v. State, 211…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bridges v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1933
- Davidson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
- Snoddy v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1924
- Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1945
- Bridges v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
3Cited by16 opinions
- Embrey v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1968
- Barnett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1974
- Diamond v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1978
- Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1961
- Liner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1977
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.