Legal Opinion

Davidson v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 17, 1924No. 8 Div. 635PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ANDERSON, O. J.

The fact that one of the jurors, Tom Edmonds, did not reside in Marshall county, did not afford a ground for the challenge of the entire array of regular jurors drawn for the week nor for a motion to quash the entire venire. Section 29 of the Jury Law; Acts 1909, p. 317; Whitehead v. State, 206 Ala. 288, 90 South. 351; Smith v State, 209 Ala. 666, 96 South. 779, and cases there cited. Neither was there error in refusing to quash the venire because of error in the name of Jurors Bagwell and Kennemar. Section 29 of the Jury Law; Smith v. State, supra; Jones v. State, 17 Ala. App.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Edwards v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
  2. Jordan v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1886
  3. Lambert v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
  4. Whitehead v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  5. Blair v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Cook v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
  2. Murrell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1979
  3. Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1961
  4. Deloney v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  5. Jones v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1948

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API