Legal Opinion

RIEPER v. Pearce

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided January 19, 2010No. COA09-131Published

1Opinion of the Court

STEPHANIE RIEPER Plaintiff,

v.

DEXTER PEARCE, Defendant.

No. COA09-131.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: January 19, 2010.

This case not for publication

Kline Law Office, PC, by Ray M. Kline, for plaintiff-appellant.

Yates, McLamb & Weyher, L.L.P., by John T. Honeycutt, for defendant-appellee.

WYNN, Judge.

"In this state, a plaintiff's contributory negligence is a bar to recovery from a defendant who commits an act of ordinary negligence."[1] Here, Plaintiff Stephanie Rieper argues that the trial court improperly dismissed her personal injury action by granting summary judgment in favor of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Pope & Talbot, Inc. v. HawnSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  2. Watson v. WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  3. Sorrells v. M.Y.B. Hospitality VenturesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
  4. Blalock v. HartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  5. Blalock v. HartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API