Legal Opinion

Klomann v. Illinois Munucipal Retirement Fund

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided September 30, 1996No. 1-95-0368PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Theis

Plaintiff appeals the trial court’s denial of his motion to review-findings of fact and reinstate pension rights. The trial court found that the record supported the Village of Lyons’ (Village’s) and the Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund’s (IMRF’s) determination that plaintiff was an independent contractor with the Village of Lyons and not an employee entitled to pension benefits under the Illinois Pension Code (Code) (40 ILCS 5/1 — 101.1 et seq. (West 1992)). We affirm.

Plaintiff, Karl Klomann, served as an attorney for the Village of Lyons from 1963 until 1989. Klomann also maintained a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Scott v. Department of Commerce & Community AffairsIllinois Supreme Court · 1981
  2. E & E HAULING, INC. v. Pollution Control Bd.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1983
  3. Ladenheim v. Union County Hospital DistrictAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  4. Varnes v. LentzAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975
  5. Billik v. Village of BrookfieldAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Michael Amundsen v. The Chicago Park District, Rob O'connor, Kathy Dunlap, Marilyn Morales, and Peter PodgorskiCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
  2. Coyne v. Milan Police Pension BoardAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004
  3. Van Harken v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999
  4. Jackson v. Retirement Board of Policemen's Annuity & Benefit FundAppellate Court of Illinois · 1997
  5. Board of Education v. Board of Trustees of the Public Schools Teachers' Pension & Retirement FundAppellate Court of Illinois · 2009

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API