Legal Opinion

Michael Amundsen v. The Chicago Park District, Rob O'connor, Kathy Dunlap, Marilyn Morales, and Peter Podgorski

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided June 30, 2000No. 99-2720PublishedCited by 81 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COFFEY, Circuit Judge.

On October 29, 1998, Plaintiff-Appellant Michael Amundsen (“Amundsen”) filed a three count amended complaint under 18 U.S.C. § 1983. In the complaint, Amundsen alleged in Count one that the Chicago Park District’s (“Park District”) administrative hearing violated due process, in Count two that the Park District and the individually named defendants (Rob O’Connor, Kathy Dunlap, Marilyn Morales and Peter Podgorski) conspired to violate his constitutional rights, and in Count three that the Park District terminated his employment in violation of the collective bargaining…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Withrow v. LarkinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Gibson v. BerryhillSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. United States v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  5. Schweiker v. McClureSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by81 opinions

  1. James Owens v. John EvansCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
  2. Nicholas Hess v. Board of Trustees of SouthernCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
  3. Kevin Carmody v. Board of Trustees of the UniveCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
  4. Fenje v. FeldDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2003
  5. Foxy Lady, Inc. v. City of Atlanta, GeorgiaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003

76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API