Legal Opinion

State v. Hayes

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 15, 1989No. M491470; CA A47365PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*389JOSEPH, C. J.

Defendant appeals his conviction for driving while suspended. Former ORS 811.175(l)(a). He contends that the initial stop of his vehicle was unlawful and that, therefore, the evidence obtained after the stop should be suppressed. He also contends that the court erred in rejecting his defense that he had not received notice of the suspension. We affirm.

The arresting officer followed defendant’s vehicle after he had received a radio report concerning it. The record does not disclose the substance of the report. While following the vehicle, the officer ran a radio check on its…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. HartCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  2. Pelay v. PloogOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  3. State v. ConnettCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  4. State v. StonerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  5. State v. StraleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. TiffinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  2. Walls v. American Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000
  3. State v. EganNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  4. State v. StookeyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  5. State v. BAKER/JAYCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API