State v. Hart
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.
Defendant appeals from his convictions for driving while suspended and driving under the influence of intoxicants. His sole contention on appeal is that the initial stop of his vehicle was unlawful and, therefore, that the evidence that flowed from the stop and resulted in the convictions should have been suppressed. We agree and reverse.
Defendant was driving along a city street when, as he approached an intersection, he pulled into the left turn lane. The intersection was controlled by a traffic signal light. The signal for cars proceeding straight through the intersection showed green. The…
2Cited by12 opinions
- State v. TiffinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
- State v. StookeyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
- State v. HayesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
- State v. CarsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
- State v. ChilsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.