Legal Opinion

State v. Egan

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 6, 1999No. 980219PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARING, Justice.

[¶ 1] Benjamin J. Egan appealed from a conviction entered upon a jury verdict finding him guilty of driving under suspension. We hold the trial court erred in refusing to allow Egan to present evidence that he did not receive a notice of opportunity for hearing on his license suspension and in refusing to instruct the jury on that issue. We reverse and remand for further proceedings.

[¶ 2] On August 7, 1997, Egan, a licensed North Dakota driver, pled guilty in South Dakota to driving a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol. The South Dakota court certified Egan’s…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Bell v. BursonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. State v. CleppeWashington Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Illinois Farmers Insurance Co. v. Glass Service Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
  5. Zamarripa v. First Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 1987

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. DvorakNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State v. NelsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  3. City of Jamestown v. NeumillerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Grand Forks Homes, Inc. v. State of North DakotaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Rojas v. Workforce Safety & InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API