Legal Opinion

State v. Connett

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 22, 1980No. K 15186, CA 17224PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, P.J.

Defendant appeals his conviction of the traffic offense of driving while suspended, ORS 487.560(1). He claims there was insufficient evidence to support the verdict and that the court improperly failed to consider his affirmative defense that he lacked notice of his suspension, ORS 487.560(2)(b).

On the date of trial, defendant appeared without counsel. After being fully advised of his right to have an attorney appointed by the court to represent him, he elected to represent himself. His case was tried to the court and he was found guilty of the offense.

To establish this traffic offense, the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. HarrisOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  2. State v. ApplegateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
  3. State v. LindseyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  4. State v. LawrenceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  5. State v. WillyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. MellingerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  2. State v. HayesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
  3. State v. MiebachCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  4. State v. HayesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
  5. State v. LindoffCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API