Legal Opinion

Hagood v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 3, 1979No. 3-1078A254PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOFFMAN, Judge.

Defendants-appellants Jerry Hagood and Dennis B. Malloy appeal their convictions of distributing obscene matter for consideration for which they were fined $5,000 each. Their appeal raises these issues:(1) whether the exhibits are obscene;(2) whether the trial court erred in failing to order separate trials sua sponte;(3) whether there was sufficient evidence that the defendants knew the nature of the items sold;(4) whether certain testimony inflamed and prejudiced the jury;(5) whether IC 1971,35-30-10.1-6 (Burns Code Ed.) is unconstitutionally vague; and

*317(6) whether the trial…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Denney v. State ex rel. BaslerIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Eckert v. BinkleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Kitts v. WillsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  4. State v. HullWashington Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Baker v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1893

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Webb v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Snider v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1980
  3. State v. BumanglagHawaii Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Indiana Department of Natural Resources v. United Minerals, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. Porter v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1982

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API