Hagood v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
HOFFMAN, Judge.
Defendants-appellants Jerry Hagood and Dennis B. Malloy appeal their convictions of distributing obscene matter for consideration for which they were fined $5,000 each. Their appeal raises these issues:(1) whether the exhibits are obscene;(2) whether the trial court erred in failing to order separate trials sua sponte;(3) whether there was sufficient evidence that the defendants knew the nature of the items sold;(4) whether certain testimony inflamed and prejudiced the jury;(5) whether IC 1971,35-30-10.1-6 (Burns Code Ed.) is unconstitutionally vague; and
*317(6) whether the trial…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Denney v. State ex rel. BaslerIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
- Eckert v. BinkleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
- Kitts v. WillsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
- State v. HullWashington Supreme Court · 1976
- Baker v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Webb v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1983
- Snider v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. BumanglagHawaii Supreme Court · 1981
- Indiana Department of Natural Resources v. United Minerals, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1997
- Porter v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1982
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.