Legal Opinion

Reconstruction Finance Corp. v. Mickelberry

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided January 10, 1938No. 34025PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOURNET, Justice.

This suit was instituted by the Reconstruction Finance Corporation as holder and pledgee of two promissory notes secured by a continuing guaranty against the guarantors for the payment of the balance due on the notes in principal, interest, and attorney’s fees. Defendants filed exceptions of no cause or right of action, which were sustained by the lower court, and the plaintiff has appealed.

Plaintiff alleged that it was the holder and owner, as pledgee, for value before maturity, of two certain promissory notes (with supporting collateral), executed by the Roseland Box…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Menard v. ScudderSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1852
  2. Continental Supply Co. v. Tuckerrose Oil Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1920
  3. Union Tank Car Co. v. Louisiana Oil Refining Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1936
  4. Larguier v. WhiteSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1877

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. JH Jenkins Contractor, Inc. v. City of Denham SpringsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1968
  2. RG Claitor's Realty v. RigellLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2007
  3. Reconstruction Finance Corp. v. MickelberrySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1944
  4. Brock v. First State Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1939
  5. Brock v. Black, Rogers & Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1939

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API