Continental Supply Co. v. Tuckerrose Oil Co.
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Appeal from First Judicial District Court, Parish of Caddo; R. D. Webb, Judge. Action by the Continental Supply Company against the Tucker-Rose Oil Company and Joseph H. Tucker and Henry Rose. Judgment of dismissal as- to two last named defendants, and plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtSommeryille, J.
Plaintiff sued defendant company on a promissory note and an open account. A judgment by default was confirmed, from which defendant company has not appealed. '
Joseph H. Tucker, president, and Henry Rose, vice president, of the defendant company, were sued on this same' note and open account and on a written contract of surety-*673ship guaranteeing the payment of same to the extent of $2,SOO.
There was judgment in favor of Tucker añd Rose, dismissing plaintiff’s suit as to them, and plaintiff has appealed.
The act of guaranty reads in part as follows:
“Shreveport, La. 5/22/15.
"The Continental Supply…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Menard v. ScudderSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1852
3Cited by17 opinions
- Walton v. Washington County Hospital Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1940
- EAC Credit Corporation v. WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- WM. B. Thompson & Co. v. SporlSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1926
- Birken v. TapperSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1922
- American Bank & Trust Company v. Blue Bird Restaurant & Lounge, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1973
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.