Crider v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Boggs, Judge.
Terri Crider appeals from her convictions for driving under the influence (less safe and per se) and failure to maintain a lane, contending the trial court erred by denying her motion to suppress. She asserts that she was in custody and entitled to Miranda warnings at the time she was interrogated by the police and asked to perform field sobriety tests. We find no merit in the assertion and therefore affirm.
When we review a trial court’s decision on [motions to suppress] evidence, we construe the evidence most favorably to uphold the findings and judgment, and we adopt the trial…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Price v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1998
- Turner v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
- State v. PierceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
- DiMauro v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
- State v. PicotCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. TurnquestSupreme Court of Georgia · 2019
- State v. TurnquestSupreme Court of Georgia · 2019
- State v. MosleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
- State v. PriceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
- Pedersen v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2016
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.