Legal Opinion

DiMauro v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 6, 2011No. A11A0189PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Blackwell, Judge.

Following a bench trial in Henry County, Nicholas DiMauro was convicted of driving under the influence of alcohol in violation of OCGA § 40-6-391 (a) (5), based on, among other things, stipulated evidence of the results of an Intoxilyzer 5000 breath test. DiMauro appeals, asserting that, because no officer read the Miranda 2 warnings to him before field sobriety tests were administered, the court below should have granted his motion to suppress evidence of the results of the field sobriety tests, as well as the Intoxilyzer 5000 breath test, which was administered later.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Davenport v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2011
  3. Aldridge v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
  4. Harper v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
  5. Waters v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Tobias v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
  2. Crider v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
  3. State v. GauthierCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2014
  4. The State v. HoltCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2015
  5. Davenport v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API