Legal Opinion

Opinion of the Justices

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided June 8, 1976No. 7494PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

To the House of Representatives:

The undersigned justices of the supreme court submit the following reply to the inquiries contained in your resolution adopted on May 26, 1976, and filed with this court on May 27, 1976.

Your first inquiry is whether the sections of Senate bill 62 “which would impose direct taxes on pari-mutuel pools” may lawfully be enacted in view of the provision of the New Hampshire *354constitution pt. II, art. 18 requiring “money bills” to originate in the house of representatives. The answer to this question is “Yes”, since the proposed “taxes”, or required payments “in lieu…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Rosenblum v. GriffinSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1938
  2. State v. Garden State Racing Assn.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1947
  3. Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1927
  4. North Hampton Racing & Breeding Ass'n v. New Hampshire Racing CommissionSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1946
  5. State ex rel. Troll v. HudsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Baines v. New Hampshire Senate PresidentSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
  2. Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1981
  3. Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
  4. Seabrook Citizens for the Defense of Home Rule v. Yankee Greyhound Racing, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
  5. Sedgewick v. City of DoverSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API